In this series of new blog posts, I want to talk about Strategic Complex Design (SCD) and its relationship to addressing complex problems.
In the previous post, I talked about categorical thinking, which is particularly useful for simplifying reality and making quick decisions, but can be limiting when addressing complex problems. By saving information into predefined categories, this type of thinking hinders the perception of nuances, adaptation to new perspectives, and the generation of creative solutions.
In this post, I intend to talk about flexible thinking, such as systems thinking, which allows us to analyze the interconnections between the different elements of a complex problem. This article is an introduction to systems thinking in its understanding of “Interconnections and Interdependencies” and “Holistic Thinking”. In later posts, I will address more elements of systems thinking and its relationship with Strategic Complex Design (SCD).
A trophic cascade is an ecological process that occurs when a change in the population of a predator at the top of the food chain causes a series of chain effects that reverberate throughout the entire ecosystem. In other words, it is when the influence of predators is not only manifested in the species they hunt, but also indirectly affects multiple levels of the ecosystem, from herbivores to plants and, in some cases, even the geography itself.
The concept of “trophic cascade” was formally developed in the 1960s by ecologist Robert Paine, who conducted key experiments on the Pacific coasts of the United States. This concept has been fundamental to modern ecology, demonstrating that ecosystems are not isolated systems of independent parts, but complex and interdependent networks where small changes can trigger large transformations throughout the entire food chain.
A classic example of this phenomenon is what happened in Yellowstone National Park when wolves were reintroduced in 1995. Wolves had been absent for 70 years, and during that time, the deer population had grown unchecked. Although humans tried to regulate their numbers, deer had consumed much of the park’s vegetation. Without natural predators, deer reduced the landscape to almost nothing, leaving little room for other species to thrive.
Despite being few, the wolves’ effects were astonishing when they returned. Not only did they reduce the deer population by hunting, but they also transformed their behavior. Deer began to avoid areas such as valleys and gorges, places where they could be easily trapped. This allowed vegetation in those areas to begin to regenerate rapidly. In some places, the height of the trees quintupled in just six years. Areas that were once bare valleys became forests of aspen, willow, and cottonwood.
With the return of the trees came the birds. The number of birds increased considerably. So did beavers, which used trees to build dams, creating habitats for various other species, including otters, ducks, fish, and amphibians. In addition, wolves reduced the coyote population, leading to an increase in the number of rabbits and mice, which in turn benefited hawks, weasels, foxes, and badgers.
Although all these effects were surprising, the biggest surprise came when it was found that the reintroduction of a small number of wolves not only affected the fauna but also the physical geography of the park. The rivers began to change, there were fewer meanders and less erosion, the channels narrowed and more pools formed, creating ideal habitats for wildlife. This was because the regenerated forests stabilized the banks, reducing their collapse and fixing the rivers in their courses. What began as the reintroduction of a few wolves ended up causing a systemic change that restored the balance of the park in its entirety. We can imagine an ecosystem as a complex web of interactions, where each species plays a role in the overall balance of the ecosystem.
A change in a key element of a complex system can trigger a series of completely unpredictable cascading effects. The example of the reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone clearly shows one of the principles of systems thinking, which considers the elements within a system as interrelated parts of a complex whole. With systems thinking, we focus on the search for patterns, relationships, and flows that explain the behavior, or mission, of the whole.
This approach is essential to understanding phenomena such as trophic cascades, but it is also crucial for solving complex problems. Unlike more linear or reductionist approaches (such as categorical thinking), which try to break down problems into isolated parts, systems thinking allows us to understand how the different components of a system interact and influence each other. This is especially important in problems where solutions are not obvious and actions can have unexpected consequences.
Systems thinking is a powerful tool for solving Complex problems, helping to understand the “big picture” and develop solutions that take into account the multiple dimensions and interactions within a system.
Systems thinking is the key to exploring, understanding and subsequently designing interventions to address complex problems. Thinking in systems allows us to go beyond the simple cause-and-effect relationship and appreciate the elements, interconnections, and purpose of a system.
Elements are the individual parts that make up a system. These elements can be tangible, such as machines in a factory, or intangible, such as ideas within an organization. Each element plays a specific role within the system, contributing to its overall functioning. For example, in the Yellowstone Park ecosystem, after the reintroduction of wolves, the main elements would be wolves as predators, elk as their prey, and beavers, whose dams create habitats for other species.
Interconnections are the relationships and links that exist between the elements of a system. They define how these elements interact and how they influence each other. These interconnections can be physical, such as roads in a transportation system, or informational, such as communication in a work team. Continuing with the Yellowstone example, wolves, by hunting elk, regulate their population and influence their behavior, which in turn impacts the park’s vegetation. The decrease in pressure from elk on trees allows the regeneration of willows, aspens, and cottonwoods, favoring beaver activity and the creation of wetlands.
The purpose of a system is its raison d’ĂȘtre, the objective it pursues. It is what defines the function of the system as a whole. The purpose can be explicit, such as generating profits in a company, or implicit, such as maintaining balance in an ecosystem. In our example of Yellowstone Park, the purpose of those who promoted the reintroduction of wolves was to maintain a dynamic balance that ensures the health and biodiversity of the park’s ecosystem. The reintroduction of wolves acted as a catalyst that triggered a series of positive cascading changes. Understanding and designing a good purpose in a system demonstrates the importance of each element in the system and its interconnections in its overall functioning.
In the relationship between these two elements of systems thinking, their application to complex problems, and the practice of Strategic Complex Design (SCD), the main elements that I focus on working on are:
Just as a map helps us visualize a territory, a map of a system allows us to make the different parts, elements, interconnections, and purposes tangible in a more understandable way. Through “Visual Sensemaking” we create these visual representations of complex information.
Visual Sensemaking is based on the idea that our brain processes visual information faster and more intuitively than textual information. By visually emerging a system, it allows us to identify its critical points, the areas where a possible intervention will have the greatest impact and we can also foresee how a change in one part can affect the whole.
We use Visual Sensemaking to:
I had the great fortune to attend a workshop given by Elizabeth Pastor, an expert in Visual Sensemaking, at La Nave Nodriza, which helped me tremendously to understand complex situations and to be able to represent them in a new and inclusive way through visualizations.
Addressing complex problems through Strategic Complex Design (SCD) does not always have to involve major revolutions or radical changes. Often, we focus on identifying incremental changes within an existing system that generate a significant and anticipated impact. Instead of redesigning an entire system from scratch, we look for small modifications that, like dominoes, trigger a series of positive effects.
Advantages of an incremental approach:
In Strategic Complex Design (SCD), using cycles such as “Build, Measure, and Learn” allows us to navigate environments of high uncertainty for complex problems. The key is constant experimentation: it is about testing hypotheses, measuring result,s and learning from feedback. This learning allows us to iterate and improve continuously, identifying which incremental changes generate the most value.
In these cycles of “Build, Measure and Learn”, I recommend the use of Dan Harmon’s – Story Circle which although it is mainly used in script writing, offers a narrative structure adaptable to the design of interventions in complex systems. In its eight stages, it allows us to build a story in the form of a script from a comfort zone to a fundamental transformation in an element and its interconnections.
Applying the Story Circle to Strategic Complex Design (SCD):
In Strategic Complex Design (SCD), it is not only about understanding connections and designing interventions, we must also facilitate their implementation through communication and collaboration between the people who are part of the intervention design. Providing efficient communication of the intervention in the system and anticipating its expected positive and negative dynamics allows for better alignment of people within the challenging environment.
Strategic Complex Design (SCD) prioritizes efficient communication for several reasons:
The most efficient solution to this communication plan is Nonviolent Communication. This type of communication strengthens collaboration and mutual understanding through four fundamental pillars:
Just as the reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone triggered a cascade of changes that revitalized the ecosystem, systems thinking invites us to understand interconnections and design interventions that generate a positive impact on complex systems.
In Strategic Complex Design (SCD), we use this type of thinking to navigate the complexity of challenges:
The wolves in Yellowstone remind us of the interconnection of all the elements of a system. Having tools that allow us to act with awareness, responsibility, and creativity to build a more interconnected and better future.